SCRASAVER
Every claim cited to the U.S. Code

MLA Protections Beyond the 36% Cap: The Banned Terms

Photo of Mario Bailey By Mario Bailey Published July 9, 2026 Cited to the U.S. Code & primary sources

Part of: The Complete Guide to the SCRA

Lenders lose money on the 36% cap, so they used to make it back on the fine print: arbitration clauses, prepayment penalties, forced allotments, waivers buried in the terms. The Military Lending Act closed that door too. Section 987(e) is a flat list of things a covered-credit contract simply may not do.

The banned terms

Under 10 U.S.C. § 987(e), restated in 32 CFR § 232.8, a creditor may not extend covered consumer credit to a covered borrower on any of these terms:

Banned termWhere it lives
Rollover, renewal, or refinance using the proceeds of other credit from the same creditor§ 987(e)(1); § 232.8(a)
Waiver of the borrower’s legal rights, including SCRA rights§ 987(e)(2); § 232.8(b)
Mandatory arbitration or onerous legal-notice provisions§ 987(e)(3); § 232.8(c)
A demand for unreasonable notice as a condition of legal action§ 987(e)(4); § 232.8(d)
Requiring a check or access to a deposit account as security§ 987(e)(5); § 232.8(e)
Requiring the title to a vehicle as security§ 987(e)(5); § 232.8(f)
Requiring an allotment as a condition of the credit§ 987(e)(6); § 232.8(g)
Prohibiting prepayment or charging a prepayment penalty§ 987(e)(7); § 232.8(h)

Each of these is a stand-alone violation. A covered-credit contract does not need to exceed 36% MAPR to break the MLA. A single banned term is enough, and it makes the contract void from inception under § 987(f).

Why each ban matters in dollars

  • No mandatory arbitration. Arbitration clauses push you into a private forum, often with fees and no appeal, and historically defeated class actions. Banning them keeps the courthouse and the private right of action open to you.
  • No waiver of legal rights, including SCRA rights. A lender cannot use the loan to strip your other protections. Your SCRA rights survive intact. If a contract makes you waive them, that clause is prohibited, not just unenforceable.
  • No prepayment penalty. You can pay a covered loan off early and pay only for the time you borrowed. No fee for escaping the debt.
  • No forced allotment. A lender cannot wire itself first claim on your paycheck through a required allotment. You keep control of how you pay.
  • No check-hold or vehicle-title security. The classic payday and title mechanisms, a post-dated check or your car title as collateral, cannot be required on covered credit.
  • No evasive rollover. A lender cannot refinance you with its own fresh credit to reset fees and keep you in the trap.

The disclosures the lender owes you

Beyond the bans, § 987(c) and 32 CFR § 232.6 require the lender to hand you real information before extending covered credit:

  1. A statement of the MAPR applicable to the credit.
  2. Any disclosures required by the Truth in Lending Act (Regulation Z).
  3. A clear description of your payment obligation.

Two of those, the MAPR statement and the payment-obligation description, must be given both in writing and orally. Under § 232.6(d), the lender can satisfy the oral requirement by giving you a toll-free number to call for the oral disclosure, but it cannot skip it. If you were never given a MAPR statement or a way to hear the oral disclosure, that is a disclosure failure worth documenting.

What these protections are not

These bans are not a rate cap. They are a separate set of prohibitions. A loan can sit at 20% MAPR, well under the ceiling, and still be an illegal MLA loan because it contains a mandatory arbitration clause or a prepayment penalty. Check both the number and the terms.

They are not the SCRA. The SCRA has its own anti-waiver rules for pre-service matters and court proceedings. The MLA’s bans apply to the specific covered-credit contract you signed during service. Do not aim an MLA banned-terms argument at a pre-service debt.

They are not optional to enforce quietly. A banned term does not just fail; it can void the whole contract and expose the lender to damages. The remedy side is covered in MLA violations and enforcement.

Scan a covered loan for banned terms

  1. Search the contract for an arbitration clause. On covered credit to a covered borrower, mandatory arbitration is prohibited under § 232.8(c).
  2. Look for a prepayment penalty. You are entitled to pay early without a fee under § 232.8(h).
  3. Check whether an allotment, a vehicle title, or account access was required as a condition. All three are banned under § 232.8(e) through (g).
  4. Read for any waiver of your SCRA or other legal rights. That clause is prohibited under § 232.8(b).
  5. Confirm you received a MAPR statement in writing and a way to get it orally under § 232.6. If not, note the gap.
  6. If any banned term is present, take the contract to installation legal assistance. A violating contract is void from inception.
The law behind this: 10 U.S.C. § 987(e) and 32 C.F.R. § 232.8

Prohibited terms in covered consumer credit: arbitration, waivers, prepayment penalties, forced allotments, and more — read the statute.

Frequently asked questions

Can an MLA loan force me into arbitration?

No. Under 10 U.S.C. § 987(e)(3) and 32 CFR § 232.8(c), a creditor may not require a covered borrower to submit to arbitration or impose other onerous legal-notice provisions in covered consumer credit. A mandatory arbitration clause in covered credit to a covered borrower is a prohibited term, and a contract containing it is void from inception.

Can an MLA lender make me repay through a military allotment?

No. Under § 987(e)(6) and 32 CFR § 232.8(g), a creditor may not require a covered borrower to establish an allotment as a condition of getting the credit. You can choose an allotment voluntarily, but a lender cannot make it a requirement, and it cannot demand a check or other access to your bank account or the title to your vehicle as security either.

Does the MLA protect my SCRA rights inside the loan contract?

Yes. Under § 987(e)(2) and 32 CFR § 232.8(b), a covered-credit contract may not require you to waive your rights under the Servicemembers Civil Relief Act or any other federal or state law. So an MLA loan cannot be used as a device to sign away your SCRA protections. The two laws reinforce each other here.

Sources

Heads up: SCRA Saver publishes general information, not legal or financial advice. Laws change and every situation differs. Confirm details with your installation legal assistance office (free for service members) or a licensed professional.

Stay ahead of the law

New guides and rate changes, in your inbox

When an issuer changes its military rate or a new protection guide goes live, you hear about it first. No spam, and you can unsubscribe anytime.

We never sell your email. Read our privacy policy.